On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 14:03 -0500, Robert Braver wrote:
> On Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:55:55 PM, RW wrote:
>
> > Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for
> > SpamAssassin. With zen being so popular, I think everything that can
> > be caught with it will get caught at the smtp level . [...]
As has been said before -- not everyone uses ZEN at SMTP level for
blocking. There is a reason SA includes ZEN by default, don't you think?
> Zen includes the SBL. The SBL includes CSS.
>
> If you are blocking at the SMTP level using Zen, there is no point
> in doing additional lookups in SA.
This holds true regardless of SBL CSS. Moreover, adding SBL CSS to SA
does *not* require an additional DNS lookup. The ZEN lookup is already
part of stock SA -- all that's needed is actually using the new return
value.
Also, "SBL CSS included in SBL" actually depends on your processing of
the returned value. SBL CSS uses a new, previously un-used, dedicated
return value of 3. If your SMTP blocking is strict and processes
known-to-be-used values only, you'll need to include SBL CSS -- just
like the situation is with SA.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
