> On Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:55:55 PM, RW wrote: > > R> Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for > R> SpamAssassin. With zen being so popular, I think everything that can > R> be caught with it will get caught at the smtp level . With SBL you get > R> additional deep hits from spammers hiding behind open-relays and other > R> exploited servers, but that seems unlikely with CSS.
On 04.10.09 14:03, Robert Braver wrote: > Zen includes the SBL. The SBL includes CSS. > > If you are blocking at the SMTP level using Zen, there is no point > in doing additional lookups in SA. unless you are checking more than lastexternal which was discussed here and could be interesting. I guess, since it's included in SBL and not PBL, it should not be restricted to lastexternal, however I'd invite someone who would run masscheck for both cases. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 2B|!2B, that's a question!
