RW a écrit : > On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:53:34 +0200 > Yet Another Ninja <sa-l...@alexb.ch> wrote: > > >> why "lastexternal" ? >> would you expect ham traffic from those IPs? and want to loose deeper >> header parsing? > > Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for > SpamAssassin. With zen being so popular, I think everything that can > be caught with it will get caught at the smtp level .
well, - some people pull mail (fetchmail, getmail, ...) from servers that don't implement zen at smtp time. - some people receive mail via external relays/forwarders that don't implement zen at smtp time. - some people add some mailing list servers to their trusted net, so they may be in the situation above (relay/forwarder) > With SBL you get > additional deep hits from spammers hiding behind open-relays and other > exploited servers, but that seems unlikely with CSS. true. they send directly, from what I've looked at.
