On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 20:30 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > On 11-Aug-2009, at 08:58, Charles Gregory wrote: > > Again, I could be wrong, and would welcome input on this, but my > > feeling is that a webmail interface is a lot more trouble for a > > spammer to write scripts for? > It's not really any trouble at all. A few lines of Perl and it's not fussy *how* it kicks the doors of the hinges. Don't underestimate just how easy it is to write code do something as trivial as abusing a web based form handler.
- Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in SMTP-AUTH Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: [sa] Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in S... Charles Gregory
- Re: [sa] Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in S... Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in SMTP-AUTH Charles Gregory
- Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in SMTP-AUTH Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in SMTP-AUTH LuKreme
- Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in SMTP-AUTH Benny Pedersen
- Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in SMTP-AUTH LuKreme
- Re: [sa] Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in S... Charles Gregory
- Re: [sa] Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in S... Ted Mittelstaedt
- Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in SMTP-AUTH rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: [sa] Re: Slightly OT - Spam opprortunities in S... Charles Gregory
- Re: your mail Kris Deugau
- Re: your mail Res
- Re: your mail LuKreme
- Re: your mail Res
- Re: your mail LuKreme
- Re: your mail Res
- Re: your mail Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: your mail RW
- Re: your mail Res