On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:30:20 -0600, LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > On 11-Aug-2009, at 08:58, Charles Gregory wrote: >> Again, I could be wrong, and would welcome input on this, but my >> feeling is that a webmail interface is a lot more trouble for a >> spammer to write scripts for?
one thing for sure is that email need to be delivered via smtp at some stage, so how would you make a script to change this ? do we talk about a unsecured website or ? > Is it a custom webmail interface you wrote yourself? If so, then sure, > that would be more of a pain. If it's Squirrelmail or something then > no, those scripts have been written ages ago. you belive that email sent from webmail is harder to spam scan then submitted email from remote ? but yes there is alot of sites that think lets disable scanning from our internal network, we newer spam, but most of them forgets it could learn ham in bayes :) -- Benny Pedersen
