On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 17:28 -0700, Derek Harding wrote:
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > submit it at there page, then its will be listed in sa, hopefully me :-)
You haven't followed the uribl list recently. For a couple of days now,
manually submitting URIs is disabled.
Also, this is a literal [dot], obfuscating the URI. SA currently can not
check that against any URI DNSBL. It's simply no URI as far as SA is
concerned.
> > i would hope some make replacetags replace " " with "" so uri will be
> > seen in uri tests or even "dot" "." :)
Just in case you didn't follow this list either today, which you
didn't... I am hacking on a solution to this. End of announcement.
> But it's not a URI it's just some text. I don't see how SA is ever
> going to submit that to any URIBL.
Not submit, but query for it. I see a URI hidden in there, and I see a
way to make SA use it for URI DNSBLs. :)
guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
