On Thu, July 16, 2009 02:14, MrGibbage wrote: > > uribl did not hit on any of the "real" uri's in the message. > > Not sure why you think they would have been triggered by the > www[dot]da39[dot]com though. SA wouldn't have sent them that URI to even > check, would it? Or am I mistaken? > > Here's the original message if anyone wants to see it: > http://pelorus.org/msg.Gqe8H
submit it at there page, then its will be listed in sa, hopefully me :-) if you find a uri that is spamming, submit i would hope some make replacetags replace " " with "" so uri will be seen in uri tests or even "dot" "." :) -- xpoint
