Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, July 16, 2009 02:14, MrGibbage wrote:
uribl did not hit on any of the "real" uri's in the message.
Not sure why you think they would have been triggered by the
www[dot]da39[dot]com though. SA wouldn't have sent them that URI to even
check, would it? Or am I mistaken?
Here's the original message if anyone wants to see it:
http://pelorus.org/msg.Gqe8H
submit it at there page, then its will be listed in sa, hopefully me :-)
if you find a uri that is spamming, submit
i would hope some make replacetags replace " " with "" so uri will be seen in uri tests or even
"dot" "." :)
But it's not a URI it's just some text. I don't see how SA is ever
going to submit that to any URIBL.
Derek
