Karsten Bräckelmann wrote on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:00:25 +0100: > Works really well for me.
Indeed, very well for us. Not just for one domain. In my opinion site-wide Bayes is the only one that makes sense unless your *single* users really send and receive *lots* of mail. The ordinary domain/user just doesn't get enough mail for a nicely working bayes db. We auto-learn all spam with scores 8 or higher. Users usually do not learn. The score for autolearning spam has been lowered to -2 to avoid learning spam that slips thru as ham. We learn all quarantined spam once per night, so that we get low-scoring spam into Bayes as well. That works fine because the FP rate for spam is almost non-existent. We also learn spam from some spam-traps. The only problems I've ever had with Bayes are expiry problems (search this list). There's something wrong with the algorithm getting used for the estimate method. I only got rid of them by going to SQL storage and manually expiring the SQL db with my own queries. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
