I finally disabled Bayes, because I think it doesn't bring me what I want: - train on error doesn't seem enough, and I can understand it
- train on everything isn't reasonable. even myself wouldn't do that, because while I can see spam and feed sa, I don't check all my mail to be sure the messages I didn't see are ham. - it's too fragile in my opinion. and I got to this conclusion a lot time ago when testing dspam. By fragile, I mean that it depends too much on how/when/... you train it - in a site wide setup, it's hard to come up with a "serious" system (get feedback but stay safe against dumb users) - in a per user setup, you get the storage cost. but that's not all: you're just ignoring the problem. lusers can't/don't train bayes... of course, if I'm writing this, it's to get opinions.
