On Mar 3, 2009, at 15:16, mouss <mo...@ml.netoyen.net> wrote:
I finally disabled Bayes, because I think it doesn't bring me what I
want:
- train on error doesn't seem enough, and I can understand it
- train on everything isn't reasonable. even myself wouldn't do that,
because while I can see spam and feed sa, I don't check all my mail to
be sure the messages I didn't see are ham.
I am considering the following:
Autolearn read mail in the inbox as ham
Autolearn mail in .Junk and .SPAM as spam
This is pretty east with maildir.
- it's too fragile in my opinion. and I got to this conclusion a lot
time ago when testing dspam. By fragile, I mean that it depends too
much
on how/when/... you train it
- in a site wide setup, it's hard to come up with a "serious" system
(get feedback but stay safe against dumb users)
- in a per user setup, you get the storage cost. but that's not all:
you're just ignoring the problem. lusers can't/don't train
That's why I'm looking at autolearn options.
