On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:19:24 -0600 Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz <luis.daniel.lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hopfield networks are not the fastest, but they can identify paterns > with noise. I was wondering to cut an image in smaller zones nxn and > then run hopfield network to detect naked body parts. After > detectin these, a grade could be done. But as Karsten said, porn images are normally linked, rather than attached, and links shouldn't be followed in case they are matched to the email address.
