Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > > Hopfield networks are not the fastest, but they can identify paterns > with noise. I was wondering to cut an image in smaller zones nxn and > then run hopfield network to detect naked body parts. After > detectin these, a grade could be done.
Unfortunately, speed and accuracy are the primary considerations here. If you can come up with something that is reasonably accurate and can run on a 300KB image in less than 1 second, then it may be useable. Whether it is needed or not is another question entirely... I haven't seen much spam with attached X-rated pictures. Usually they just have links to the sites and occasional IMG tags with links to remote pictures. -- Bowie
