-----Original Message----- From: Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz [mailto:luis.daniel.lu...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 4 March 2009 9:19 a.m. To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Hopfield nerons for porn image detection
Good one, Hopfield networks are not the fastest, but they can identify paterns with noise. I was wondering to cut an image in smaller zones nxn and then run hopfield network to detect naked body parts. After detectin these, a grade could be done. Any comment. ------------------------------------------------------------ Yes - Why even bother detecting naked body parts when there is little point? Others on this list have already commented about the fact that there is very little image Spam out there nowdays - in fact, is there any?, and what there is uses external links to display it's content, there are no images in the actual E-Mail message, or attached to it. I guess if you really wanted naked body part image matching work, you could write another Net-Nanny style program to filter websites for families... 2c Cheers, Mike
