Hmm... Sahil, Nitin -- guys, you are seriously confusing me.
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 12:00 +0530, Nitin Bhadauria wrote: > Sahil Tandon wrote: > yes i did train the sa data by Nitin, neither of your headers shows *any* BAYES_XX hit. Whatever you trained doesn't seem to be the user SA runs as. > > > ftp://195.169.149.102/tt/ATM.txt > > > > Sending MX is blacklisted on dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net; message also caught > > by SA: > > > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE, > > HTML_MISSING_CTYPE,MISSING_MIME_HB_SEP,MPART_ALT_DIFF,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS > > autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Sahil, this is just odd. The examples *do* have the HB_SEP blank line. I guess your download broke or something, but these rules don't apply to the given spamples. Even worse, your rules hit account for a total score of 7.032. Might I ask which rules scores you changed? > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=4.9 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, > SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.4 Nitin, this isn't the same result as your original scan. Whatever that is, it is a different mail. Care to clear the confusion? :) guenther -- char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
