Sahil Tandon wrote:
Nitin Bhadauria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How is it possible that these kind of mail are not spam tagged my
sapmassassin.......
Do you train SA's bayes database? Do you use RBL checks? Do you use
ClamAV with stock and SaneSecurity signatures?
yes i did train the sa data by
|sa-learn --showdots -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --spam
/var/spool/mail/virtual//quarantine/.spam//*
and here is my postfix checks...
reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
and if u suggest i may add |dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net too.
And yes i don't have clamav with SaneSecurity signatures but yes i am
going to use it from now..
http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/usage.htm
CONGRATULATION YOU HAVE WON 850.000.POUNDS(REPLY TO
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
ftp://195.169.149.102/tt/WON.txt
The sending MX is listed on several DNSBLs, among them sorbs and ahbl;
also caught by ClamAV: Email.ScamL.Gen711.Sanesecurity.08062506.
YOUR REF:CLAIMS/ATM/822 .........
ftp://195.169.149.102/tt/ATM.txt
Sending MX is blacklisted on dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net; message also caught
by SA:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_MISSING_CTYPE,MISSING_MIME_HB_SEP,MPART_ALT_DIFF,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Here is my spam-status.................
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=4.9 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.4
Thanks for the help...
