On Aug 5, 2008, at 7:32, Nitin Bhadauria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jens Kleikamp wrote:
Nitin Bhadauria schrieb:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Nitin Bhadauria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How is it possible that these kind of mail are not spam tagged
my sapmassassin.......
Do you train SA's bayes database? Do you use RBL
checks? Do you use ClamAV with stock and SaneSecurity signatures?
yes i did train the sa data by
|sa-learn --showdots -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --spam /var/spool/
mail/virtual//quarantine/.spam//*
and here is my postfix checks...
reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client
cbl.abuseat.org, reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
and if u suggest i may add |dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net too.
If you would read the website of uceproject you would know that it
is really not recommended to use the level 3 Blacklist to block
mails at the mta layer.
They recommend 1 and 2 for strict blocks and level 3 for scoring
systems.
so want me to add this rbl check in spamassassin .........
Neither of us said that. Just making you aware of these things. It is
your call.
