On Friday 20 July 2007, jdow wrote:
>From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> John Rudd wrote:
>>> Further, I as the sender have no obligation to participate in your
>>> anti-spam mechanism. It's YOUR mechanism. You feed it, you configure
>>> it, your CPU cycles are spent on it. I have no obligation to
>>> participate in the program you use for deciding "is this spam or not". I
>>> have no obligation to devote my time and my CPU cycles to your anti-spam
>>> program. It's rather rude for you to assume otherwise.
>>
>> My company's website has a "click here and we'll send you your password"
>> (or something similar). You'd be amazed how many calls we get claiming
>> it doesn't work. When I track through the logs, I find most come from
>> people with CR systems. You can't use a CR when you're talking to a
>> robot. These things make me sooooooo mad.
>
>I wonder how many "I can't get off this #)$([EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list!"
>messages
>are due to a recently installed C/R system.
>
>C/R systems CAN be their own punishment.
>
>{^_-}
Not CAN my dear girl, ARE...
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Whistler's Law:
You never know who is right, but you always know who is in charge.
