.rp wrote: > I just switched from using spamassassin to spamc in our procmail. > > * > is there an equivalent of 'spamassassin -d' for spamc? > Do you really mean "spamassassin -D"? -d does markup stripping, -D does debugging.
If so, you can pass -D to spamd, but you'd have to debug everything spamd processes. There is no direct equivalent on spamc, as spamc itself doesn't run any of the rules, it's just a dumb client. > > * > > > * spamd is running with > > '-d -H -s /usr/temp/spamd.log -u esp -r /var/run/spamd.pid' . > spamc is running with '-u esp' , which is a normal account. > Yet in the log, I am getting the following error/warning messages: > Wed May 9 14:12:17 2007 [12597] info: spamd: setuid to esp succeeded > Wed May 9 14:22:19 2007 [12597] info: spamd: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for esp:520 > Wed May 9 14:12:19 2007 [12597] warn: auto-whitelist: open of auto- > whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile > /home/esp/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.nnn.abc.com.12597 for > /home/esp/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: Permission denied > > * > How can I control the verbosity of the logging? > start spamd with -D > > * > > > > thanks,
