.rp wrote:
On 9 May 2007 at 22:34, Matt Kettler wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 09 May 2007 22:34:48 -0400
From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3 spamc questions, version 3.2
To: ".rp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: users@spamassassin.apache.org
.rp wrote:
I just switched from using spamassassin to spamc in our procmail.
*
is there an equivalent of 'spamassassin -d' for spamc?
Do you really mean "spamassassin -D"? -d does markup stripping, -D
does debugging.
NO, I really mean -d .
spamc doesn't have the equivalent to spamassassin's -d. spamc doesn't
markup (or remove markup) from mail. Continue to use spamassassin -d
where you were before.
no one has ideas why the SA3.2 is complaining about having rights to the
.spamassassin file when the same non-root user is being used for spamd
and spamc ?
If I had to guess I'd say that the non-root user doesn't have rights to
the ".spamassassin file", which is actually a directory, or at least
should be. Check your filesystem permissions.
Daryl
