On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:

> The question was about a corpus of email. I assume that it means
> that the email is from multiple sources.

Correct. Assume for the sake of argument that the distribution of
domains being checked somewhat reflects the distribution of ISP sizes
- for example, there would be more aol.com and hotmail.com addresses
than most other domains.

Also, duplicates would be collapsed so caching isn't really
beneficial.

> So I doubt that someone running it would even be detectable buy
> anyone else.

Well, yes, but whether or not you get caught does not affect the
morality or courtesy of an act...

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  You are in a maze of twisty little protocols,
  all written by Microsoft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 15 days until Thomas Jefferson's 264th Birthday

Reply via email to