Sorry to mess up the thread, I lost the original > -----Original Message----- > From: Dhawal Doshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 9:39 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Annoying stocks scams > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi List! > > [ ... ] > > meta HILO_STOCKS ( __HILO_STOCKS1 && __HILO_STOCKS2 ) > > describe HILO_STOCKS Looks like stocks scam > > score HILO_STOCKS 3.5 > > > > It's my first meta rule, which only gives a score if both > conditions are > > true, and I was wondering if there's a possibility to make > the score > > more "intelligent" : > > > > - if __HILO_STOCKS1 fires up, i would like to give the > score maybe 0.5 > > - if __HILO_STOCKS2 matches as well together with > __HILO_STOCKS2, make > > it 3.5 [ ... ]
Define two metas, the first one hits only when 1 is true and 2 is false The second hits when both are true. You have to use the negation for 2 In meta one or you would double dip whenever both are true. meta HILO_STOCKS_1 ( __HILO_STOCKS1 && !__HILO_STOCKS2 ) meta HILO_STOCKS_2 ( __HILO_STOCKS1 && __HILO_STOCKS2 ) describe HILO_STOCKS_1 Looks like stocks scam First Hit Only describe HILO_STOCKS_2 Looks like stocks scam Both Hit score HILO_STOCKS_1 0.5 score HILO_STOCKS_2 3.5 If you wanted to score the 0.5 whenever either 1 or 2 is true and the other is false meta HILO_STOCKS_1 ( (__HILO_STOCKS1 && !__HILO_STOCKS2) || (!__HILO_STOCKS1 && __HILO_STOCKS2) ) Rick -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
