On 3/6/2007 5:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> It's my first meta rule, which only gives a score if both conditions are 
> true, and I was wondering if there's a possibility to make the score more 
> "intelligent" :

my local rules use combinations. any message that hits AT LEAST one rule
gets the L_STOCKS_1 match. messages that hit more than one ALSO get a
separate score, in addition to L_STOCKS_1:

meta            L_STOCKS_1      (__L_STOCKS_01 || __L_STOCKS_02 ||
__L_STOCKS_03 || __L_STOCKS_04 || __L_STOCKS_05 || __L_STOCKS_06 ||
__L_STOCKS_07 || __L_STOCKS_08 || __L_STOCKS_09 || __L_STOCKS_10 ||
__L_STOCKS_11 || __L_STOCKS_12 || __L_STOCKS_13 || __L_STOCKS_14 ||
__L_STOCKS_15 || __L_STOCKS_16 || __L_STOCKS_17 || __L_STOCKS_18 ||
__L_STOCKS_19 || __L_STOCKS_20 || __L_STOCKS_21 || __L_STOCKS_22 ||
__L_STOCKS_23 || __L_STOCKS_24 || __L_STOCKS_25 || __L_STOCKS_26 ||
__L_STOCKS_27 )
describe        L_STOCKS_1      One or more stock markers
score           L_STOCKS_1      1.0

meta            L_STOCKS_2      (( __L_STOCKS_01 + __L_STOCKS_02 +
__L_STOCKS_03 + __L_STOCKS_04 + __L_STOCKS_05 + __L_STOCKS_06 +
__L_STOCKS_07 + __L_STOCKS_08 + __L_STOCKS_09 + __L_STOCKS_10 +
__L_STOCKS_11 + __L_STOCKS_12 + __L_STOCKS_13 + __L_STOCKS_14 +
__L_STOCKS_15 + __L_STOCKS_16 + __L_STOCKS_17 + __L_STOCKS_18 +
__L_STOCKS_19 + __L_STOCKS_20 + __L_STOCKS_21 + __L_STOCKS_22 +
__L_STOCKS_23 + __L_STOCKS_24 + __L_STOCKS_25 + __L_STOCKS_26 +
__L_STOCKS_27 ) == 2)
describe        L_STOCKS_2      Two stock markers
score           L_STOCKS_2      4.0

meta            L_STOCKS_3      (( __L_STOCKS_01 + __L_STOCKS_02 +
__L_STOCKS_03 + __L_STOCKS_04 + __L_STOCKS_05 + __L_STOCKS_06 +
__L_STOCKS_07 + __L_STOCKS_08 + __L_STOCKS_09 + __L_STOCKS_10 +
__L_STOCKS_11 + __L_STOCKS_12 + __L_STOCKS_13 + __L_STOCKS_14 +
__L_STOCKS_15 + __L_STOCKS_16 + __L_STOCKS_17 + __L_STOCKS_18 +
__L_STOCKS_19 + __L_STOCKS_20 + __L_STOCKS_21 + __L_STOCKS_22 +
__L_STOCKS_23 + __L_STOCKS_24 + __L_STOCKS_25 + __L_STOCKS_26 +
__L_STOCKS_27 ) == 3)
describe        L_STOCKS_3      Three stock markers
score           L_STOCKS_3      9.0

meta            L_STOCKS_4      (( __L_STOCKS_01 + __L_STOCKS_02 +
__L_STOCKS_03 + __L_STOCKS_04 + __L_STOCKS_05 + __L_STOCKS_06 +
__L_STOCKS_07 + __L_STOCKS_08 + __L_STOCKS_09 + __L_STOCKS_10 +
__L_STOCKS_11 + __L_STOCKS_12 + __L_STOCKS_13 + __L_STOCKS_14 +
__L_STOCKS_15 + __L_STOCKS_16 + __L_STOCKS_17 + __L_STOCKS_18 +
__L_STOCKS_19 + __L_STOCKS_20 + __L_STOCKS_21 + __L_STOCKS_22 +
__L_STOCKS_23 + __L_STOCKS_24 + __L_STOCKS_25 + __L_STOCKS_26 +
__L_STOCKS_27 ) > 3)
describe        L_STOCKS_4      Four or more stock markers
score           L_STOCKS_4      20.0

My scores are high because I have some mail accounts on other networks
that are lightly whitelisted and I need to hit the spams that come from
there. Do not use those scores or else you will fry mailing lists etc.


Reply via email to