Loren Wilton wrote:
4. He then COMPLAINS that rules are causing him FPs and demands that the rules be changed.
Your rule is matching against messages which it shouldn't.
5. He THEN claims I am lying and making false assertions when I state that the rule in question (that I wrote) would NOT HIT on the headers as posted, and as "proof" he repeats the same headers, which BY TRIVIAL INSPECTION show the rule would not hit - so the headers have been modified in the documentation provided.
You're ignoring that several other people have confirmed the same problem. I can send you a dozen examples.
Honey, if I ever cared about your problems, I sure as heck don't now.
Code either works or it doesn't. Your code doesn't. How you feel about that is irrelevant.
-- Jo Rhett Network/Software Engineer Net Consonance
