>>> Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/22/07 01:20AM >>> Loren Wilton wrote: > 4. He then COMPLAINS that rules are causing him FPs and demands that > the rules be changed.
Your rule is matching against messages which it shouldn't. > 5. He THEN claims I am lying and making false assertions when I state > that the rule in question (that I wrote) would NOT HIT on the headers as > posted, and as "proof" he repeats the same headers, which BY TRIVIAL > INSPECTION show the rule would not hit - so the headers have been > modified in the documentation provided. You're ignoring that several other people have confirmed the same problem. I can send you a dozen examples. > Honey, if I ever cared about your problems, I sure as heck don't now. Code either works or it doesn't. Your code doesn't. How you feel about that is irrelevant. -- Jo Rhett Network/Software Engineer Net Consonance =====================> Yet another thread from Jo Rhett that deteriorates into a flame war. This seems to always happen. Jo...you catch more flies (fixes to your problems) with sugar (being nice, even if you don't want to) than with a machete (the way you are). Rob
