Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: > I thought you voted for letting Mail::DKIM spew whatever it wanted. :) > > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5095#c3 > > Probably not a bad idea since it may encourage people to upgrade to > newer versions of Mail::DKIM that fix whatever is being spewed about.
well, it may be easy for us to not produce the invalid input that's causing this one... --j. > Daryl > > > Justin Mason wrote: > > Can you capture a message that causes this, and open a bug on the > > bugzilla? I haven't seen that before. (Even if it's harmless, > > the warning message is ugly.) > > > > --j. > > > > Raul Dias writes: > >> I have being getting a lot of this in my logs: > >> > >> Feb 14 21:55:13 s spamd[7249]: dkim: invalid DKIM-Signature: invalid > >> (unsupported protocol) > >> at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DKIM.pm line > >> 339, <GEN114> line 390 > >> > >> Is this something I should worry about? > >> > >> AFAIS, it is related to broken DK implementation on the sender, shouldnt > >> this be reflect as some score instead of a warning? > >> > >> -Raul Dias > >
