snowcrash+spamassassin wrote:
In any case, why the fuss? You've had three SA developers tell you the
rules that are published are fine how they are.
wow.
what "fuss" ? i've been polite in my intent and in my asking. this
*is* the "users" list after all.
Nah, I'm probably just in a really pissy mood waiting for snow, staring
at my skis. Sorry.
i'm asking questions so that i understand. contrary to what you may
believe, i actually read those comments several times and still wasn't
clear. "lastexternal" had *not* been mentioned, "notfirsthop" *had*.
It wasn't clear to me what you wanted to know. It looked like you were
looking to add or change some rule since. lastexternal and notfirsthop
are both explained in the documentation.
In any case, I think my explanation of why lastexternal was used rather
than notfirsthop answered your query.
Regards,
Daryl
