Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: > If you're > referring to jm's post, I think he just made those rules up as they're > not what we're publishing for 3.1.
It's the rules from SVN trunk. > -lastexternal is exactly what they're asking for. In the case where the > client connects directly to their MSA which then connects directly to > your MX, -lastexternal is functionally equivalent to -notfirsthop. > > -lastexternal is almost definitely what you want to use for any dynamic > client sort of list as it allows for people running their own MSA that > has a dynamic-listed IP which then forwards to a smarthost which in turn > connects to your MX. -notfirsthop would FP for this setup. hmm. I'd better fix trunk then ;) --j.
