Re: spamhaus' PBL is now *active* (in beta ... but still active). now what?

[John Rudd]

Justin Mason wrote:

That would be the case if the PBL rule looked like:
  header RCVD_IN_PBL          eval:check_rbl('zen', 'zen.spamhaus.org.', 
'127.0.0.1[01]')

instead of

  header RCVD_IN_PBL          eval:check_rbl('zen-notfirsthop', 
'zen.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.1[01]')

note "notfirsthop" --



ah, I didnt' know about notfirsthop.  That addresses it completely. 
Cool :-)