Sander Holthaus wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Larry Nedry wrote:
On 12/29/06 at 2:50 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote:
What are you using?
Currently I am using only zen.spamhaus.org. The rest of the
RBLs that I have tried have had too many false positives to be
useful for my requirements.
Which RBLs do the rest of you folks feel comfortable using?
I use a few others from sorbs.net, but I don't see them having
any effect as zen.spamhaus.org catches everything first... :)
I've been using sbl-xbl for a while, and then recently switched to
zen.
I also recently added list.dsbl.org (called before zen, so I can
see how much it's really catching). It's pretty small (about 1/6
of what zen catches).
I'm also contemplating adding dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net.
I tend to put the newest (to me) rbl first, so I can see what it's
actually catching before the stuff I was already using :-)
zen != xbl-sbl. It is xbl-sbl-pbl. AFAIK, the PBL's aren't active, but
will be in near future. You might want to change the scoring for
PBL-entries.
Yes, I never implied that zen == sbl-xbl. However, for now, according
to spamhaus, zen only contains the production databases, so it IS
currently (practically) the same as sbl-xbl. The difference is that
once the PBL becomes fully published/public, zen will include all 3, but
sbl-xbl will not.
So, if what you want is "the one with everything [fully publicly
published]" you can start using zen now and wont have to make a change
in the future.
