On 14-Dec-06, at 4:35 PM, j o a r wrote:
On 14 dec 2006, at 20.40, Gino Cerullo wrote:
I presume the answer you gave is an admission that you are, in
fact, using email forwarding as the method behind your spam
filtering system.
The link from perkel.com -> junkemailfilter.com is pretty self
explanatory. It all makes sense now...
I already knew the answer, I just wanted him to admit it in front of
everyone but he didn't. He opted to send the email directly to me,
off list but I put it back in for everyone to see.
Marc's, rants have nothing to do with the perceived short comings of
SPF but everything to do with the threat to his flawed business model.
There are work-arounds to Marc's problems if he thinks about it a
little but he's so fixated on what he's read about SPF breaking
forwarding he "can't see the forest through the trees" so to speak.
Marc: Since you already require that your customers modify their MX
records to have their email sent to your servers, why not update /
add the appropriate SPF records at the same time? That would
prevent any problems caused by SPF checks.
No, that's not the solution and I'm not going to share it with him
either. He'll have to work it out himself.
--
Gino Cerullo
Pixel Point Studios
21 Chesham Drive
Toronto, ON M3M 1W6
416-247-7740
This email address protect by SPF! Want to protect your domain's
email from forgery? Visit openspf.org
