On 14-Dec-06, at 10:30 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm not the one who brought it up.
Gino Cerullo wrote:
Marc,
I get the impression that you run a business that markets itself
as an anti-spam solution and it's based on forwarding email and
that business model is threatened by the growing adoption of SPF.
Now, I maybe I'm completely wrong but your incessant rants over
this leads me to think otherwise. Regardless, if you have concerns
about SPF and it's perceived relations to anti-spam or it's
problems with email forwarding why are you continuing to bring it
up on this list. The venue for it is the SPF Discuss and the SRS
Discuss mailing lists.
To subscribe to those lists use the following addresses.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a complete list of SPF related discussion list please visit
the following page.
http://www.openspf.org/Forums
I presume the answer you gave is an admission that you are, in fact,
using email forwarding as the method behind your spam filtering system.
To me that sounds like an abuse of the email forwarding feature to
accomplish something that it was not designed or meant to be used
for. So you see, many people, including yourself, are using the email
system in ways that it was not meant or at least, envisioned to be
used for.
--
Gino Cerullo
Pixel Point Studios
21 Chesham Drive
Toronto, ON M3M 1W6
416-247-7740
This email address protect by SPF! Want to protect your domain's
email from forgery? Visit openspf.org
