On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Tim Litwiller wrote:
I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did
you have to change?
Reading RDJ setup, it kept mentioning that I would have to add
statements to local.conf for each and every ruleset that I imported.
This is why I didn't bother, and used sa-update instead.
I'm wondering if there is anything I'm missing...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has
any insights different than what I have observed.
SA-Update seems to require less configuration changes. In short,
all I did was make a file with a list of rulefiles that SA-Update
should check, and everything worked without any other changes.
RDJ required lots of local.cf changes for no obvious gain that I
could see. This is why I chose sa-update.
RDJ does do the job of restarting the daemon for you, but it
needed to be hacked if you were using amavisd.
Is there any difference here that I'm overlooking? Any advantage
to RDJ?
And leading to my next point, given that sa-update is working
fine -- isn't rdj going to be slimmed down to just the part that
restarts the process after running sa-update?
Why not?
--
Jo Rhett
Senior Network Engineer
Network Consonance
