Hm. I'm surprised on no answers. Can I persist? This topic is of real
interest to me...
Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any
insights different than what I have observed.
SA-Update seems to require less configuration changes. In short, all I
did was make a file with a list of rulefiles that SA-Update should
check, and everything worked without any other changes.
RDJ required lots of local.cf changes for no obvious gain that I could
see. This is why I chose sa-update.
RDJ does do the job of restarting the daemon for you, but it needed to
be hacked if you were using amavisd.
Is there any difference here that I'm overlooking? Any advantage to RDJ?
And leading to my next point, given that sa-update is working fine --
isn't rdj going to be slimmed down to just the part that restarts the
process after running sa-update?
Why not?
--
Jo Rhett
Network/Software Engineer
Net Consonance
