Re: sa-update versus rulesdujour questions

[Tim Litwiller]

I've never changed anything in local.cf when using RDJ - what did you 
have to change?

Jo Rhett wrote:
Hm.  I'm surprised on no answers.  Can I persist?  This topic is of 
real interest to me...

Jo Rhett wrote:
Okay, there's no docs on this so I wanted to ask if someone has any 
insights different than what I have observed.

SA-Update seems to require less configuration changes.  In short, all 
I did was make a file with a list of rulefiles that SA-Update should 
check, and everything worked without any other changes.

RDJ required lots of local.cf changes for no obvious gain that I 
could see.  This is why I chose sa-update.

RDJ does do the job of restarting the daemon for you, but it needed 
to be hacked if you were using amavisd.

Is there any difference here that I'm overlooking?  Any advantage to 
RDJ?

And leading to my next point, given that sa-update is working fine -- 
isn't rdj going to be slimmed down to just the part that restarts the 
process after running sa-update?

Why not?