Matt Kettler wrote: >but in this case you gotta admit you're asking for >the exact same kind of information as a spammer needs
Marc 's purposes are "innocent", Marc is a trustworthy person, and anyone who has the answer certainly can reply back directly to Marc so as to not post such sensitive information on a public list. So I don't personally see a problem with providing him with the answer (if available!) since he is not a spammer and he is using this method for good purposes. But I also understand that this method is a bit controversial... but not anything to be compared with a spammer. --Rob McEwen
