From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 08:47:19PM -0700, jdow wrote:
I've been contemplating that to a degree. It would be nice if I could
use the standard rule paths and designate one extra directory for
included rules from it. Then I could run, for a two user installation,
a pair of spamd processes with a minimalist number of children and
optimize the filtering.
But from the aesthetic standpoint is there a way right now to perform
this hack?
Hrm. You'd have to run the other spamd on a different port (or different IP),
but you could have a different site config path (spamd --siteconfigpath). If
you want to share between the two instances, you can symlink config files and
such.
That's the first thing that comes to mind anyway.
<<jdow>> I was thinking that if an 'include' directive existed that
could accept the -u username parameter value as one of its components
the idea would be a slam dunk.
{^_^}
