On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 08:47:19PM -0700, jdow wrote: > I've been contemplating that to a degree. It would be nice if I could > use the standard rule paths and designate one extra directory for > included rules from it. Then I could run, for a two user installation, > a pair of spamd processes with a minimalist number of children and > optimize the filtering. > > But from the aesthetic standpoint is there a way right now to perform > this hack?
Hrm. You'd have to run the other spamd on a different port (or different IP),
but you could have a different site config path (spamd --siteconfigpath). If
you want to share between the two instances, you can symlink config files and
such.
That's the first thing that comes to mind anyway.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I can shoot the manager while I'm at it ... kind of like a bonus."
- Shawshank Redemption
pgpf0z6M4MIBO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
