jdow writes: > From: "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > >> It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as > >> they all work. > >> > >> Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from > >> RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without configuring about 62 > >> sa-update channels (one for each ruleset RDJ manages). > >> > > > > True, but doesnt that make more sense than having 2 separate programs > > which both pull down updated rules for SA, but from 2 different locations? > > Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied with SpamAssassin, > that is broken for performing updates.
what's the "broken" part? --j.
