On Jun 9, 2006, at 3:16 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:


MS Exchange... one big Database

Exactly...

And that is one reason why I wouldn't touch this SQL idea with a 10 foot pole.. the fact that Exchange works this way only proves my point... I hear all the time about Exchange servers crashing and the administrator having to rebuild the database while the mail server is down for the next 10 hours.

The bottom line is that using a SQL DB backend as mail storage is putting
all your eggs in one basket.


Not really. With MySQL you can mirror and stripe data across multiple back end servers. You lose one of the back end storage nodes? No big deal. Just get a new one up and running before you lose all of its mirrors.


Though, I would agree that using MS Exchange would be a bad idea.

Reply via email to