On Monday, June 12, 2006, 10:23:20 AM, qqqq qqqq wrote: > I bought a Barracuda Model 400 last October. My current setup is as follows: Barracuda GW --->> Internal servers ---> Spamassassin server ---> Quarantine or local delivery.
> Although there was a small percentage of spam being caught by adding the > Barracuda, this was because > I added my own Regex rules on the Barracuda. Without my Regex rules, using > their "intent" RBL, a > trained bayes, and SBL-XBL RBL, the devise gave me nothing in terms of more > spam captured than > Spamassassin with SARE. In fact, I don't have concrete numbers but I am > willing to put $100 and say > SA/SARE does better. Doesn't Barracuda use SpamAssassin in their boxes? If so it's not too surprising that it wouldn't perform much differently from SpamAssassin.... :-) Barracuda may not use SARE, so SARE may indeed be better. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
