>...
>Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 00:52:39 +0100:
>
>> After some research, I came to the conclusion that .de is, indeed,
>> still broken:
>>
>> <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3912.txt>
>
>And *where exactly* does this RFC say that the whois input and output must
>behave in a different way than the .de input and output does now?
>
>Kai
>
>...
Asked and answered - RFC1032. Feel free to continue to ignore any
facts you don't like, but this argument is past tiring.
Paul Shupak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
