Tracey Gates wrote: > I apologize if this has already been addressed.....I am using CGPro with > CGPSA. I have placed an entry in my local.cf > > "whitelist_from_rcvd *(at)domain(dot)com domain(dot)com" > > I find that spamassassin is marking it as spam with the following: > > Content analysis details: (5.9 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > 4.8 FROM_KING_COM From known spammer 'king.com' > 1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry > 3.1 URI_MAIL_COM URI: Link to 'mail.com' - spam central! > -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% > [score: 0.2548] > 1.9 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY: HTML: images with 2400-2800 bytes of words > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > -0.5 SARE_HEAD_DATE_LONG1 Date header has interesting length > -4.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list > > How do I get these to actually come through without going through SA?
Get CG to not call SA in the first place. I > thought that if I whitelisted them that SA would allow all the emails > from that domain to come through without being scanned. Nope, it won't bypass the mail. However whitelisting does cause USER_IN_WHITELIST to fire off with a -100 score, but that's not matching here. This tells me that your whitelist_from_rcvd is not working. One thing that sticks out to me is are you SURE you've got the right second-half (the Received: header reverse-dns host-name match part)? i.e: Does your mailserver really have an IP that has a reverse-dns record with a name ending in "domain(dot)com". >From the outside, it looks like your mailserver is: 69.155.252.163 with RDNS 69-155-252-163.ded.swbell.net. Not sure how it looks inside your network, but make sure your mailserver is inserting the matching hostname into its received: headers > I'm guessing > I'm wrong but that's nothing new. Can someone tell me what I need to > do? > > Thanks!
