Clay Davis wrote: > When I --lint my rule set I get the warnings below; however, I do see a > corresponding rule score in 50_scores.cf for each: > > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_ONLINE > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_VIC > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_VA > warning: score set for non-existent rule DEEP_DISC_MEDS > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_GENERIC > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_C > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_COMBO > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_L > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_P > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_VIA > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_SILD > warning: score set for non-existent rule ONLINE_PHARMACY > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_CAPS > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_S > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_X > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_DOSAGE > warning: score set for non-existent rule VIA_GAP_GRA > > Thanks for any suggestions,
Care to at least tell us what version of SA you're using? Those score declarations should NOT be in the /usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf that comes with SA 3.1.x. However, those those score delcarations SHOULD be present in 50_scores.cf for SA 3.0.x, and the rules should be in 20_drugs.cf. Based on that, it looks like you've got a bad mix of rule files from different versions of SA. Is there any chance anyone did something foolish like copy 50_scores.cf to /etc/mail/spamassassin?
