Tracey Gates wrote: > I had those as well and I went into the 50_scores.cf and commented out > those rules that are listed as non-existent.
Where'd you get your SA? Those shouldn't be there for SA 3.1.x. > > > > Tracey Gates > Lead Developer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Clay Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 11:28 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: --Lint Warnings > > > When I --lint my rule set I get the warnings below; however, I do see a > corresponding rule score in 50_scores.cf for each: > > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_ONLINE > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_VIC > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_VA > warning: score set for non-existent rule DEEP_DISC_MEDS > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_GENERIC > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_C > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_COMBO > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_L > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_P > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_VIA > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_SILD > warning: score set for non-existent rule ONLINE_PHARMACY > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_ED_CAPS > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_S > warning: score set for non-existent rule SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_X > warning: score set for non-existent rule DRUG_DOSAGE > warning: score set for non-existent rule VIA_GAP_GRA > > Thanks for any suggestions, > Clay > > > >
