Re: [Mimedefang] Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Fw: Interesting Phishing Trick

[Kenneth Porter]

--On Wednesday, March 08, 2006 2:24 PM -0800 Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

It's an interesting use, but I don't believe it would confuse
SpamAssassin, etc.  The second URI should be visible enough to be
checked, and I added the IP to ph.surbl.org.

Is there an SA rule that checks for nested anchors? (Either in 3.1 or 
SARE.) Any signs of this idiom in ham corpuses?