On Wednesday 08 March 2006 21:57, jdow wrote:
>From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> --On Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:40 PM -0500 Theo Van Dinter
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Not in SA proper. For curiosity sake, I wrote up a quick rule to
>>> test it out:
>>>
>>> MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
>>> 0 27920 4940 0.850 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
>>> 1.400 1.0852 3.1781 0.255 0.00 1.00 TVD_NESTED_ANCHOR
>>>
>>> ie: it's pretty horrible.
>>
>> What MUA generates all the FP's?
>>
>> Makes me wonder about installing outbound filters that run a
>> validator and reject anything that fails. I often see flame wars on
>> mailing lists about allowing HTML posts to the list, but I wonder
>> how the arguments would change if one allowed only *validated* HTML.
>> I'll bet most who insist on using HTML would immediately be rejected
>> by the validator. "Sorry, your message was rejected because your MUA
>> vendor writes garbage that we can't parse, and makes you look like a
>> spammer." ;)
>
>I'd still take part in the HTML only user's lynching.
>{o.o}
You might have to get in line there, Joanne. I'm the guy with the rope,
lemme through please.
--
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
