Dan Bongert wrote:
> I recently did an email server change/upgrade from Sendmail on
> FreeBSD (w/ Spamassassin 2.6.4) to Postfix on RHEL 3 (w/Spamassassin
> 3.1). On both systems, Spamassassin is called from user's .procmailrc
> files--not every user wants to be running SA (I'm not quite sure why).
> 
> I wasn't able to convert people's Bayes databases from one system to
> the other--the Linux system didn't recognize them at all as valid DB
> files, so everyone had to start Bayes over from scratch.
> 
> Here's my problem: the new SA doesn't work nearly as well as the old
> one. Some of my users are reporting 50% false negatives in their
> inbox in the morning, even after their Bayes autolearning has kicked
> in. We run a nightly learning script for them, and have been telling
> everyone to put any and all false negatives in the appropriate
> mailbox so that sa-learn can snag them. 
> 
> For my own experiences, I'm seeing a lot more spam that's being
> autolearned as ham--scores of 0.0 and even negative ones for things
> that to my eyes are very obviously spam.
> 
> It's a pretty vanilla set up so far--are there any recommended
> optional rules sets or tweaks I haven't discovered for 3.1 yet?
> Unfortunately, I don't have any hard numbers comparing the set ups,
> just lots of complaints that the new version isn't as good.

Sounds like you've got some configuration issues.

Take a look at your local.cf, init.pre, and v310.pre files and see if
you see anything obvious.

run "spamassassin --lint" and make sure you don't see any errors.

Take a look at the headers of some of the emails.  If you see hits for
ALL_TRUSTED on any emails from outside your network, you need to fix
your trust path (trusted_networks).
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath

As for recommended rule sets, I run most of the SARE rule sets.
http://rulesemporium.com/rules.htm

Make sure your network tests are working.

Razor2, DCC, and Pyzor can also make a big difference.

Once you get this sorted out, nuke your Bayes databases to get rid of
all of the bad learning and start over learning ham and spam.

-- 
Bowie

Reply via email to