Loren Wilton,

Thanks a lot for your good suggestions.

        



>> Are there any optimizing options for SA (I mean the performance)? if we
>want to run SA on our antispam system.
>> There are more than ten millions of messages coming into our system
>everyday.
>
>My.  You'll need at least several SA machines to carry that load.  And a
>boatload of memory on each.  However, with a reasonable configuration for
>the expected load it shouldn't be that much of a problem.
>
>The things I can think of offhand:
>
>1.    Probably turn off AWL so that you don't have to deal with the overhead
>of database updates.
>
>2.    Turn off auto-update on Bayes and run your own update from a cron job.
>You will probably want to be running the updates almost continuously under
>that load, but you want to get the updates off of the normal mail path.  You
>probably want to adjust the autolearn threshholds to make sure the database
>gets a good start in life.  (You may want disable Bayes initially until you
>get a basis system working, then bring it online.)
>
>3.    You will need lots of children and probably considerable tweaking
>initially to get things adjusted to carry your load and not go into
>threashing on the machines.  Obviously you will need a way to distribute the
>incoming mail to multiple checking machines.
>
>4.    You will want one or more local DNS caches for some of the network
>tests.  You will probably want to sign up for rsync access on the major tet
>tests like SURBL.
>
>5.    You will probably want more than the stock rules files.  But with the
>load you will have you may need to be selective about which additional files
>you pick.  Also, I think you may commonly get oriental-language mail that is
>valid, so you will have to check carefully for any false positives, and
>possibly adjust scores on some of the rules.
>
>6.    There are people working on Japanese and Chinese spam rulesets.  You
>may want to get in touch with them and see if their sets will help you.
>
>Those are all very general suggestions.  I have no experience with those
>load levels, but some people here do.  They should be able to offer more
>concrete advice.
>
>        Loren
>
>.




Reply via email to