(top posting because not a reply:) this message triggers: URIBL_BLACK (nease DOT net. found in the message footer) MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY (because of X-Originating-IP: [218.19.159.186])
and also DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE DNS_FROM_RFC_POST MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER is the uribl listing justified or is it too "aggressive"? Jeff Peng a écrit : > Hi,Lists, > > I'm new to SpamAssassin.How about SA's TOP capability on antispam? Can I > use it instead of some commercian antispam products?Thanks. >
